| HIGHEST SCORE POSSIBLE |
Activity | CRITERIA |
SCORE |
|||
| 1. Does not meet standard |
2. Partially meets standard |
3. Meets Standard |
4. Exceeds Standard |
|||
|
12 |
Section Questions |
-all questions not answered -no depth in answers -no knowledge of topics evident 3 |
-most questions answered. -little additional information given -little knowledge of subject 6 |
-all questions answered -some questions have been expanded upon -good grasp of subject-research evident 8 |
-all questions answered in detail -all questions have been expanded -shows deep knowledge of subject matter and in-depth research 12 |
|
8 |
The World Next Door |
-no research evident -report is far short of minimum length -no links evident as requested 2 |
-some research -close to minimum objectives met -few links provided 4 |
-subject has been researched -report meets minimum length -many Internet links provided -research is well presented 6 |
-research is extensive and well
thought out -report is above minimum length and well thought out -understanding and knowledge of subject is evident. -extensive and useful Internet links 8 |
|
12 |
Tour of Detroit |
-less than 10 markers used -no use of Internet links -tour does not follow logical route. -did not use mapping site for guidance 3 |
-more than 10 markers used -has used mapping Internet sites for map -evidence of logical layout -some links for markers used 6 |
-uses 15 markers for map multiple and useful links provided -interesting markers used -well laid out tour and easy to follow -good use of mapping sites 9 |
-uses 20 markers for map -links provided to all markers, all useful and appropriate -obvious great time spent designing tour -interesting and thoughtful locations chosen -demonstrates well developed and thought out layout -integrated into mapping Internet site 12 |
|
8 |
Food Court |
-only one culture investigated -no explanation of cultural differences -no examples of restaurants for court 2 |
-two cultures researched -some knowledge of cultural differences and tastes in food -some examples of restaurants 4 |
-three cultures researched -research evident for all cultures required and generally correct information -correct number of restaurants suggested 6 |
-three cultures researched with
well
researched and written information -in depth analysis of food preferences between cultures researched -appropriate choice restaurants with description of cuisine -questions answered completely and with evidence of extensive research 8 |
|
20 |
Group Presentation |
-no organization -did not meet time requirement - all group members did not participate in presentation -little proof of group work evenly delegated 5 |
-shows some evidence of planning
and organization -near minimum time requirement -most group members participate -not all sections researched are presented -completed own assigned job 10 |
-organized -within suggested time frame - all participate in discussion -shows enthusiasm -all members participated 15 |
-time spent organizing and
compiling information -within suggested time frame -all members actively engaged in presentation. -listens to and takes all ideas into consideration -logical presentation of material 20 |
|
60 |
TOTAL SCORE |
|
||||
| Bonus 4 |
BonusQuest |
-few key sites on map -messy and not much thought evident -visually not interesting 1 |
-basic map submitted -minimal time spent on assignment -visually acceptable for basic map 2 |
-full map drawn or computer
generated -key elements located on map -visually attractive, colorful 3 |
-much thought and time spent -very detailed map -extensive detail and color used 4 |
|
60 |
TOTAL + BONUS |
|
||||
Please proceed to Conclusion Page...